Skip to main content

September

September was not a particularly good month for Reading Football Club. Two points from fifteen see us (quote, unquote) languishing toward the wrong end of the Championship. Poor football has exacerbated the fans' annoyance, but are things really as bad as they seem?

Played five, drawn two, lost three. It sounds bad, but when you consider the goal difference over those five matches is only -3 (or the same as our loss away to Brentford last year) it's clear that we're much closer than our points haul makes out. We're not shipping goals in blow out losses like last season.

Instead all our problems are at the other end. Four goals in the same period is a serious issue, and thus we come to the start of our bad run - game one, Bristol City at home. Now this, unequivocally, was a game that we should have won. Bodvarsson allowed the critics in with a fairly substandard performance that allowed ex-Swindon centre back Aden Flint to win it late on. Bristol went into the international break in fourth place, and we out matched them for the majority of the game.

I admit I wasn't there for Brentford away, and Bodvarsson continued his downward spiral by being brought off at half time. Stam, though, has to be given some credit. The home side, at least in terms of stats, were running away with the game in the first half, but by all accounts The Royals were much better in the second period after Stam changed the approach.

It was difficult to find positives in the Hull game, but the game was saved by Bodvarsson's heroics and he recouped some good will. The change to be more direct seemed to work, even if it was Hull allowed us back into the game.

I don't think anybody who went to Millwall thought we should have lost. Again, not a good game of football but when you go in front with fifteen minutes left you should see it out. Two George Saville goals changed that, but Reading again had some nice periods of play. McCleary on the right seeming to work better than his central role the previous weekend. The dismissal from the referee of a late challenge on the goalscorer Edwards seemed laughable, and denied the chance to salvage a point.

Finally Norwich. A tremendous free kick, and a complete lapse in concentration from the defense overshadowed what was a much better opening forty-five minutes. The team looked lively, and up for it as they came back pretty much immediately from going a goal down.

Really, there were three games where we played poorly in the middle, three that we were unlucky not to take more from anyway, and still no extra points because of that.

Now, ifs and buts mean nothing. It is, famously, a 'results business'. That said I think we're not as far away as some suggest. If Stam over the international break - and this is admittedly a big if - has found a way to add goals to the team then we're in a very strong position.

Obviously, that is much easier said than done, but I think it's clear that in many ways it's not the striker where the problem lies per se, but the ability to get balls into dangerous areas. Something that we were much better at last season, and will be better at again this season. In fact, Bacuna in many ways was the shining light of the team against Norwich, and his drive set off many of the more dangerous attacks. I don't think it's any coincidence that in the second half he was less involved, and we went off the boil as a result.



So, with Bacuna returning, and other players poised to take their part after injury, hopefully now is the time to start our resurgence. It will be tough, and I don't think getting no points from Leeds or Sheffield would necessarily be the end of the world - and certainly not a situation to rebel further, but we starting to need a return in home games against Middlesbrough and Nottingham Forest after that.

Look on the bright side, there's only forty days until our first fixture against Bolton.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scout Report: Brentford

It almost feels superfluous to write about a Brentford team who have already been covered so extensively. Famed for their player recruitment the core of their side is a young, attack-minded group of players who seemingly love to play together. They tend to play 4-3-3, with Watkins as the main striker, and Benrahma and Mbeumo attempting to find space to either side of him. The midfield three is given stability by Christian Norgaard in the holding role, while Dasilva and Jensen are free to push on. Even goalkeeper David Raya Martin is crucial to the team's attacking intent. His quick distribution reminiscent of Marcus Hahnemann bowling out to Bobby Convey to set the winger away. That said defensively the Spaniard can occasionally be caught out, infamously allowing Ryan Tafazolli to pass the ball from the halfway line into the Brentford net. That's not the only mistake he's made this year - a missed punch condemned Brentford to a loss at Kenilworth Road, and similarly lead to

Reading FC Season Review | 2020/2021

When your season starts with your manager having to watch your opening match from the hotel because he's not been hired in time to beat the quarantine, anything above getting relegated should probably be classed as a success. And Reading exceeded surely even the most optimistic of pre-season predictions. Veljko Paunovic Veljko Paunovic almost exclusively utilised a core group of players in a 4-2-3-1, only changing things when enforced. One of the consequences of that is that Reading had more players play over 3,000 minutes than any other side (roughly three-quarters of the season). That consistency is often seen as a good thing, but in a condensed season, it surely contributed to the injury woes. It can't have helped that the manager also used the second-fewest number of players over the course of the season. His substitutions were often categorised as late (Reading's subs played just 16 minutes on average, only Norwich's played fewer) or non-existent (Reading were 19t

If Anything, Reading's Win In Wales Is Just More Of The Same

Paunovic has been under increasing pressure in recent weeks. Last Tuesday he received criticism from all quarters after a dire midweek defeat to Sheffield United, where he changed the shape of the team to nullify the opposition threat. Although there were some interesting takes by those who didn't seem to fully appreciate the formation, it was clear that it wasn't just the opposition's attacking threat that the manager put the mockers on. And yet, one win seems to redeem all. My personal view on The Gaffer is that, given the injuries in the squad, he's doing as well as could reasonably be expected. Obviously he's made errors, but he's also been handicapped by off field matters. The six-point deduction has made the gap to relegation closer than it ought to be, but the team are clearly good enough to comfortably pull clear over the course of the season and, indeed, have been achieving if Reading had started on minus 6.  So my issue isn't with him, but with th